[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Minutes from Thursday night meeting



Hi all,

To clearly:
During the meeting, we decided not to invest the submitters team resources in
the investigation and debates on the admin interfaces BEFORE THE INITIAL
SUBMISSION.

It was the majority vote to keep the admin interfaces proposed by 2AB for the
initial submission. It does not mean, as far as I understand, that the
submitters decided to have exactly these interfaces in the final spec. After we
resolve other more critical issues and have the initial submission on the
table, we might go back to the question of admin interfaces. I'll record the
issue of the admin interfaces in the issues list so that we all remember that
the issue is outstanding.

Now, we really need to concentrate on putting the initial submission text
together.

Konstantin

> Hi,
> 
> First a correction to the attendee list in the minutes... I was there :-)
> although a bit late because the AB meeting ran long.
> 
> At 09:50 PM 9/22/98 -0400, Jim Williams wrote:
> 
> > good ideas shouldn't be just tossed aside. 
> >
> 
> Jim: I am a bit unsettled by your choice of words.  I don't think that the
> minutes or the discussion at the meeting is indicative of this at all.  In
> any submitter team there are going to be a number of ideas about the
> appropriate way to solve a problem and professional debate and respectful
> disagreement are expected.  Such issues must be resolved for a joint
> submission team to proceed.  We agree that the needs of the healthcare
> industry must be addressed and the submitters who disagreed with this
> particular approach to expressing rules is committed to accomodating those
> needs with a specification that will be accepted (and implemented) by
> vendors and useful to users.  We all have great respect for Konstantin, his
> ideas and contributions, which is why I must take exception to your
> comment.  The next round of IDL is  restructured significantly as a result
> of direction and comments (including valid criticisms) that I received from
> team members including Konstantin.  I would be happy to consider any
> detailed critique you'd like to offer on the submission as well.
> 
> Carol
> 
> _________________________________________________________
> Carol Burt                                             2AB, Inc.
> cburt@2ab.com                                     Integration Architects
> 205-621-7455                                        www.2ab.com
> Member, OMG Architecture Board          OMG Domain Member
> 
>    --  integrating yesterday's systems with today's technology --


----------------
Broadcast message to hrac-rfp from Konstantin Beznosov <beznosov@baptisthealth.net>.
Go to http://cadse.cs.fiu.edu/omg/hrac-rfp to browse the mail list archive.