Re: problems [not] being addressed?

[Carol Burt <cburt@2ab.com>]

Hi,

PIDS had a section like that if you want to look at an example
corbamed/98-02-29.pdf.  This would also be a place where it would be
appropriate to expand on the "optional" requirements that are not addressed
by the submission and expand on why.  The earlier section is just a bullet
list of whether the items is covered by the spec with no detailed rational
for what is in and what is out or the limitations of the items that are "in
scope".   There is a bit of overlap here with the scope section that we can
work on after we get 2 sets of words.

Carol 

At 01:46 PM 10/1/98 -0400, Konstantin Beznosov wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I'm supposed to fill in the sections on "problems [not] being addressed"
in the
>submission. Does anybody have an idea what people usually put in those
sections
>and what specifically for this submission is expected to be in those
sections?
>
>Konstantin
>
>----------------
>Broadcast message to hrac-rfp from Konstantin Beznosov
<beznosov@baptisthealth.net>.
>Go to http://cadse.cs.fiu.edu/omg/hrac-rfp to browse the mail list archive.
> 
_________________________________________________________
Carol Burt                                             2AB, Inc.
cburt@2ab.com                                     Integration Architects
205-621-7455                                        www.2ab.com
Member, OMG Architecture Board          OMG Domain Member

   --  integrating yesterday's systems with today's technology --
----------------
Broadcast message to hrac-rfp from Carol Burt <cburt@2ab.com>.
Go to http://cadse.cs.fiu.edu/omg/hrac-rfp to browse the mail list archive.