Re: [COAS-List] COAS submission

["Tom Culpepper" <tcculpepper@wpmail.code3.com>]

Jon,
Chuck mentioned that you had experienced some troubles when
you developed the prototype of COAS. Can you elaborate?
Tom

>>> "Jon Farmer" <jfarmer@ic.net> 03/04 12:40 PM >>>
I agree with Tom's recommendations.  Here's a small wording fix

IN 1.3 LQS Tom wrote:
...provides all the necessary interfaces for a client or server to attain
information from coding schemes ...
I think Tom meant "obtain" when he wrote "attain".

Ahhhh. Feels good to be a contributor!
Jon

-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Culpepper <tcculpepper@wpmail.code3.com>
To: coas@cs.fiu.edu <coas@cs.fiu.edu>
Date: Thursday, March 04, 1999 2:28 PM
Subject: [COAS-List] COAS submission


>All,
>I would like to make a suggestion that we remove the following from section
3.3
>
>"CareFlow|Net and Philips Medical Systems have jointly created an object
model, containing a subset of the HL7
>information model and incorporating much of the observation related items,
on which
>they have based their prototype IDL for accessing clinical observations."
>
>It seems a bit out of place, I guess I don't see it as an explanation of
the HL7 Information Model.
>Maybe you can move it up under section 3.2 somehow.
>
>Also,
>I have attached a new section on the Interoperation with Naming, Trader,
PIDS and LQS. Please provide any comments.
>Chuck can you please make this part of the errata document?
>
>Thanks
>Tom
>
>