No Subject

Discussion of extensibility and content sensitivity is in (2) Section
4.1 and the discussion sections of (3). In-depth description of the
implementation approach for extensible predicates is in (3). The less
formal description in  Section 2.3 of (3) summarizes the approach."

There was a short discussion on how rich and extensible the language
of access rules should be. No consensus was reached due to the fact
that the discussion did not go into enough level of details. It was
suggested to continue the discussion of the rule language/interface
expressiveness in the next calls and e-mail exchanges.

6. New submitters/supporters and LOI re-opening
Carol asked if anyone is opposed to Inprise joining the response
team. Nobody was opposed. Konstantin mentioned that a company
"Strategic Data Command" contacted him and the company wants to
contribute to the response. The company is supposed to contact
Konstantin to let him know if they committed to contributing to the
response. Bob and Carol mentioned importance of obeying to the LOI
due dates and not reopening LOI each time somebody wants to join
submitters.

7. Action items for the next (7/14/98) conference call:
 A. Bob Blakley to set up a conference call on 7/14/98 2:00 PM
Eastern time.
 B. Bob Blakley to send the object model sketch and initial draft of
interfaces in IDL to the response team mailing list by the end of
this week (7/4/98).
 C. Konstantin to send to the mail list several use cases that show
how the policies that he sent earlier has to be enforced by a
clinical application.

--17481778-2037799477-901030545=:18401--
----------------
Broadcast message to hrac-rfp from Konstantin Beznosov <beznosov@baptisthealth.net>.
Go to http://cadse.cs.fiu.edu/omg/hrac-rfp to browse the mail list archive.