Re: [Terminology]

[John Barkley <jbarkley@nist.gov>]

>I hope everyone will forgive my denseness, but why don't we just call 
>the thing invoking the ADO the "ADO Client??

I agree. Why don't we just use that terminology for the time being. 

The fact the ADO Client may have other special characteristics is
important and should be highlighted in the context of discussions where
these characteristics are pertinent. However, at this point in the
discussions, I think we need a way to refer to an "ADO Client"'s
"client-ness" regardless of whatever other characteristics it might
have. When the time comes to produce actual specification text, then
more discriptive words can be used if we're clever enough to think of
them.

jb
----------------
Broadcast message to hrac-rfp from John Barkley <jbarkley@nist.gov>.
Go to http://cadse.cs.fiu.edu/omg/hrac-rfp to browse the mail list archive.