[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
No Subject
I'd say that OMG's RFP process is even more proactive with RFIs-- the
process takes time as a measure of sanity, IMHO ;)
-steve
http://www.ietf.org/tao.html#RFCs_and_I_Ds
http://src.doc.ic.ac.uk/computing/internet/rfc/rfc2026.txt
4. THE INTERNET STANDARDS TRACK
Specifications that are intended to become Internet Standards evolve
through a set of maturity levels known as the "standards track".
These maturity levels -- "Proposed Standard", "Draft Standard", and
"Standard" -- are defined and discussed in section 4.1.
6.2 Advancing in the Standards Track
A specification shall remain at the Proposed Standard level for at
least six (6) months.
A specification shall remain at the Draft Standard level for at least
four (4) months, or until at least one IETF meeting has occurred,
whichever comes later.
These minimum periods are intended to ensure adequate opportunity for
community review without severely impacting timeliness. These
intervals shall be measured from the date of publication of the
corresponding RFC(s), or, if the action does not result in RFC
publication, the date of the announcement of the IESG approval of the
action.
-steve
To unsubscribe send a note to majordomo@cs.fiu.edu with the body of the message
being: unsubscribe cadse-orb